The London 2012 official logo was unveiled about a week ago and has caused quite the commotion. Most reactions have been negative, many verging on being violently so. Some are calling for its immediate withdrawal, while others are certifying it as a failure…5 years before it will be able to show any success.
I can see where the detractors are coming from - it is a major departure. However, I feel that there is a great deal of short-sightedness and reactionary thinking going on. Why am I sticking up for this design? Because of this one short paragraph in the brand mission statement that I think everyone dismissed as meaningless fluff:
“The new emblem is dynamic, modern and flexible. It will work with new technology and across traditional and new media networks.”
The Olympics already has a logo - the 5 rings - that is instantly recognizable and crosses all linguistic and cultural barriers. It is fixed, unmatched and untouchable. A steadfast rock. Conversely, the London 2012 logo looks like a frenetic Keith Haring figure (see the pink one on the right, below) - ambiguous, vague, and meant to change and adapt. It is pure attitude and personality.

I have the feeling that this “icon of the games” is just the tip of the iceberg, and that it’s real value will emerge through the branding system. Given the history and ethos at Wolf-Olins, it is a very real possibility that the logo will take on an entirely different purpose and not behave like a traditional logo at all. Instead I can see it being a highly adaptable, emergent vehicle for the spirit of the games.
My prediction is that this branding system will grow on people and continue to evolve as 2012 draws near.



0 Responses to “Causing a Stir”